« Today's Reading - 12/16/08 | Main | What if the Iraqi Journalist Threw His Shoes at Saddam Hussein? »

Column: Less Government, Less Corruption

From my column today:

Learning that a Senate seat was being sold was offensive and shocking to many Americans. But what they tend to forget is that Senate seats and other political appointments are not the only things that could be, and are being, sold by politicians all the time.

Taxpayer funding for special pet projects is continuously sold by most members of the U.S. Congress to those who play the game through political contributions and private treats. These earmarks are the most obvious and continuous form of kickbacks we see in politics today. Disturbing questions can indeed be raised about most earmarks. Barack Obama, for example, requested a $1 million earmark for a Chicago hospital a year after it raised his wife’s salary by $200,000. Sounds like a good investment for the hospital.

Indeed, politicians have made it very profitable for special interests to contribute, entertain and lobby for money. The auto industry and its affiliates, for example, have spent $65 million in the first nine months of this year on political contributions and lobbying, and the unions have invested substantial amounts as well. One would think that a struggling industry and unions would use such large sums of money on directly saving their companies and jobs. But in return for throwing it at politicians, they will probably receive a multi-billion dollar bailout in the coming months. Recipients of corporate welfare, such as agricultural subsidies, enjoy similarly excellent deals with politicians. The same goes for government contractors and beneficiaries of selective regulation.

How are any of these illustrations any less shocking and deplorable than what Blagojevich did?

Read the rest of my column here.

Posted on Mon, December 15, 2008 at 10:10AM by Registered CommenterPaul Ibrahim in , , , | Comments1 Comment

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (1)

Just curious as to thoughts from anyone on the recent suggestions from the pundits that our congressmen actually need raises. The thought process was that being in congress should be "worth it" when comparing it to a civilian job.
What ever happened to duty to country? I thought serving as a representative was just that "SERVING".
The only bone I'll throw to the pundits is that anyone willing to serve has to endure the anal probes in the media to get there (mostly for conservatives). To that, I can only encourage aggressive use of the alternative media and adhering to true conservative principles. Too many candidates sell out at the first sign of trouble.

Mon, December 15, 2008 at 01:37PM | Unregistered CommenterGrey Conservative

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>